A Mother’s Redemption
in PHILOMENA
A bittersweet tale of a mother’s search
for a loved one from her past forms the core of Philomena, a real life semibiography of atonement and forgiveness
amid ignorance and the passage of time. As
directed by Stephen Frears (The Queen, My
Beautiful Laundrette) from a screenplay by Steve Coogan and Jeff Pope from
Martin Sixsmith’s book, “The Lost Child
of Philomena Lee”, it features impressive acting and an affecting story.
Martin Sixsmith (Steve Coogan) is
an unemployed news writer in Britain who is searching for direction in his
life. At the same time, an elderly woman,
Philomena Lee (Judi Dench), prays in church and commemorates an anniversary of the
pain and loss of her illegitimate son. She recalls the distant memories of
working at an abbey in Ireland and being forced to give her young boy for
adoption. Her plight makes its way to
Sixsmith who at first is not interested in human interest stories, but
Philomena’s anguish kindles a curiosity within Sixsmith and eventually grows
into a crusade that has the support of a publisher. Stymied
by false leads and lost records, Philomena’s desperate search for her adult son
leads to a revelation and the truth despite the dogmatic doctrines of a holy
institution.
Simultaneously a love story of a mother for her child and an investigative mystery, this is essentially a two person play, in which Philomena and Martin are contrasts in personality and background-she has a naïvety about her while he is a born cynic. That she must experience a full spectrum of emotions during her journey from shame to anticipation to despondency contrasts with Martin’s determination, anger, and frustration.
As expected, Dench (Skyfall, Notes on a Scandal) excels in
the sensitive role of an older woman anxious to reconnect with her son. She even gets the nuances and behavior of a
woman who has had a sheltered, broken life and lacks the sophistication and social
graces of normalcy. This detail is nice texture to her character. Like the sole photograph she has of her son,
she clings to memories and hopes of redemption.
Coogan is quite convincing as the determined reporter, quite a contrast
to his comedic roots in British television and film.
There is liberal use of
flashbacks to show Philomena’s life as a teenage girl. Sometimes dredging old memories can cause
great pain not only for Philomena, but for other people who hold clues to her
son’s whereabouts. What become of
him? What kind of relationships and
profession did he have in life? And
perhaps, most importantly, did he ever wonder about his birth mother?
The film shows how life can be a
series of events punctuated by remarkable links and coincidences particularly
in one revelatory moment that serves as a remarkable thread that binds the
principals together. Some antiquated
themes recall the stigma of being an unmarried mother and the practice of adopting
illegitimate children through the church.
In some ways this film is the flip side to The Cider House Rules.
It calls into question how much
an institution like the Catholic Church may or may not have been complicit in the knowledge or whereabouts of
her son. It seems too obvious to place
responsibility and condemn the Catholic Church, the very foundation of faith,
and its nuns as villains. In fact you
wish you could learn much more about the motives and thinking of the older nuns
and countless other nameless victims that passed through the abbey; Philomena
is but one story. What about Philomena’s
life beyond the abbey? We see that she also has a grown daughter, and yet we
don’t have those details.
After all that has transpired, the detective work, and globetrotting
from Europe to the United States, there is only the love between a mother and
her son. In the end, a mother’s hope and
a reporter’s quest become a heartfelt search for the truth, a truth born of
love that transcends time.
***1/2 of **** stars
No comments:
Post a Comment